A Little Take-Away from "The Future of Literacy"
Of Semiotic Resources and Typographies
This week's reading helped me to finally come to an understanding of what ‘affordance’ or ‘semiotic potential’ mean. It leads me to conclude that anything at all: words, objects, images and gestures, as soon as it is deemed as a semiotic resource, can be interpreted or in this case afford different kinds of interpretations or meanings and thus the semiotic potential can be described. However, one has to note that as much as an artefact’s semiotic potential can be described, it is still fixed to the context in which it is situated. For example, in the following:
Without the context, this image can be interpreted as a juggler, a person balancing many responsibilities which are equally important, a person who is about to cover protect his head from falling balls and etc...The interpretations I have listed above are possible description of the image’s potential. My point here is that this image’s affordance is limitless and for semioticians to be able to describe all of its potential is impossible. To realise the true meaning of the image, it has to be tied to where and how this image is used in other words, the image has to be contextualised.
The inventory of semiotic potential is non-exhaustive as chances are; the potential is defined for a specific purpose in which affordance of the resource in other domains could be neglected.
Typographies

Beyond “Flowerness”
From what I know of spider lilies, it can be found almost everywhere in Singapore as a decorative plant by pathways or surrounding institutions or buildings. It is hardy and blooms for a short period of time of over 2-3 weeks and withers soon after. Despite its short blooming span, the abundance of these lilies continues to beautify the surrounding consistently replacing the withering ones.
Thus, with that prior knowledge, one possible meaning potential that the image can afford would be how these white spider lilies could be the semblance of love. Tough love to be precise where realistically in relationships between a man and his wife, arguments, that might wither the love, are no strangers to the relationship. At the same time, the cycle of withering and blooming like that of spider lilies metaphorically represent how love withers and blooms.
The white petals signify purity and thus show how love is at its purest when it is blooming. However, at the same time, the petals seem to be drooping down rather than bloom upright like a rose. With reference to this week's reading, van Leeuwen mentioned that metaphors highlight some aspects and repress others, thus indicating what is important for the purpose of the given context. Hence, in this case, I truly wonder what aspect of 'love' is repressed and whether this repression actually uncovers the connotation of love that lies within the spider lily.
“Literacy in Three Metaphors” by Scribner
What does it take for one to be literate today? Is it any different from the world I grew up in then? 20 years ago was the first time I entered school. Was I not literate before I entered school? It is interesting to read and note that the big names in the academic world are still debating about how literacy is to be defined. Yes, it encompasses many parameters in which some might be contradicting the other. However, when we bring this reading down to Singapore's educational context, I would pick Literacy as Adaptation as our guiding be
acon in the EL curriculum.
Reason being, the Ministry had picked and chosen what is important to be covered by which level in accordance to our context. The genre approach in which our curriculum takes on suggests that the Ministry has carefully selected what is necessary for us to function in society. As years progress, Singapore's EL curriculum changes too. These changes, I believe, is made to better cater to the future world in which our children will grow in. Here, the notion of literacy as adaptation stands strong simply because whatever that makes us literate as an individual is dependent on how our society has changed.
Back in primary school, we learnt how to merely write letters and its various degree of formality. Now, pupils learn how to write emails, a convention similar to letters, however differ in terms of immediacy and its capability to tap on various designs of meaning making. Presentations in class back then comprise of mounting boards and construction papers while now pupils can tap on PowerPoint or even Flash animations to deliver their ideas. Schools now have to evolve, and driven by the new curriculum, equip pupils with these literacy skills so as to ensure their relevance in tomorrow's world.
Comment on “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies”

Test/First Post
Found a decent template alas... (= Indeed, this is the beginning of my first blogspot address in my life. Tried blogging in the past using other domains however I would call my then attempts 'rantings' rather than 'blogging'.